What Is A False Flag?
A false flag is a diplomatic or military action that is intended to be blamed on an opponent. Countries have frequently done this by launching a real or fake strike on their side and claiming that the enemy was responsible as a pretext for war.
The old world order false flags originated during the 16th century to explain how pirates used the flag of a friendly country to trick shipping vessels into allowing them to approach. False flag strikes have an extensive and undignified history.
False flag strikes were a common tactic used by pirates to deceive their victims into believing that they were being approached by a friendly ship. They would then attack the ship and plunder its cargo.
The old discussion was about AI fear. Now it’s time to move forward.
Are you searching for strange content…?
Are you curious about false flag operations, what they are, and whether they are real or not? Watch the whole history of the False Flag TV Show on The Edge of Wonder TV! This show covers the dark history of false flags and the operations that were planned to blame the other nation.
This show covers the historical examples of so-called false flags, from the Gleiwitz radio station incident to invade Poland to the Gulf of Tonkin event that gave rise to the Vietnam War. It also observes the concept of false flags in the context of the recent conflict in Russia. Join The Rise TV Show to explore the facts and evidence.
Germany invaded Poland in 1939:-
On the night before Germany attacked Poland, 7 German SS troopers posing as Poles assaulted Gleiwitz, a German radio station on the German side of the border. They broadcast a brief message announcing that the radio station was now under Polish control.
The troops also left aside the corpse of a civilian disguised as a Polish trooper to make it appear as if he had been slain during the raid. The next day, Adolf Hitler delivered a speech in which he used the Gleiwitz, Germany incident and other similarly staged occurrences to justify his invasion of Poland.
Beginning of the Russo-Finnish Conflict, 1939:-
In the same year, the Russian town of Mainila was shelled. It was near the Finnish boundary, and the USSR used the purported strike to violate Finland’s non-aggression pact, so initiating the so-called Cold War.
Historians have recently established that the village’s shelling was a fiction by the Soviet NKVD (Narodny Komissariat Vnutrennikh Del) state security organization, rather than by the Finnish army. Boris Yeltsin, the Russian Federation’s first president, agreed in 1994 that the Winter Conflict was an aggressive Soviet rivalry.
Gulf of Vietnam Tonkin, 1964:-
On August 2, 1964, an American destroyer engaged in a sea battle with North Vietnamese torpedo boats in the Bay of Tonkin, near the Vietnamese shore. Both sides’ vessels were damaged, with the North Vietnamese losing four men and suffering six other wounded. The United States National Security Agency reported that two days later, another comparable battle took place.
However, it is becoming more probable that the North Vietnamese’s second strike never occurred. The commander of an American naval defender initially reported that he was being encircled and attacked by enemy attack boats, but then stated that he was unsure due to severe weather and insufficient visibility. Declassified records revealed in 2005 suggest that the North Vietnamese navy was not assaulting the US ship, but rather attempting to salvage two of the boats wrecked on August 2.
Little Green Men on the Crimean Peninsula, 2014
In the initial stages of Russia’s invasion of Crimea, people began to appear on the streets uniformed and equipped like Russian troopers but with no Russian markings on their uniforms.
The Kremlin said they were part of local “self-defense organizations” who wanted the land back to Russia from Ukrainian rule. The Kremlin stated that they had purchased their attire and weapons from stores. Russian newspapers dubbed these people “polite men,” but Crimean civilians dubbed them “little green men,” referring to both the color of their uniforms and their uncertain origin.
The Kremlin’s attempt to paint the “polite men” as part of a local “self-defense organization” was an attempt to mask the fact that they were Russian special forces. This is evidenced by the fact that the “polite men” had the same uniforms and equipment as Russian military special forces, and by the fact that their movements were coordinated with Russian military forces.
What's your reaction?
